我們有一個新名字!閱讀公告。(一個新的網站正在開發中。)
補償濕地和河流減少擴張,尤其是在美國西部,可用性和聯邦土地的重要性將變得越來越影響減輕的執行有關。此外,由於土地管理機構麵臨經濟條件限製,將會有越來越多的興趣替代形式的收入和資金來源的恢複。因此,它是現實的期望補償的問題緩解在聯邦土地越來越相關土地管理和監管機構。這就引出了一個問題:如果聯邦土地管理機構要創建政策形式化緩解他們的土地,他們需要考慮什麼主要的考慮,選擇需要承認什麼?
這個報告代表考試的補償性緩解水生資源(即。,streams and wetlands) on U.S. federal lands through an examination of case studies and a review of the legal landscape in which such mitigation takes place. While the authors neither promote nor discourage mitigation on federal lands at this time, we do present a series of considerations and recommendations that should be taken into account as federal agencies begin formalizing policies regarding compensatory mitigation on their lands. While our review of existing federal lands mitigation projects was not comprehensive, it draws on learnings from significant cases that were highlighted by individuals deeply involved in these processes—federal agency members, nonprofit employees, and private mitigation bankers. Some of the issues identified with compensatory mitigation on federal lands drawn from case studies presented here may represent outliers, but are nevertheless important to emphasize so that, as policies for these processes are institutionalized, such issues can be addressed accordingly.